FAQs 1 — Bricks 3D Metrology

Dimensional Metrology Topics

What is Dimensional Metrology?

Dimensional metrology is a branch of metrology that focuses on the measurement of physical dimensions such as length, width, height, diameter, and angles of objects or components. It involves the use of various tools and techniques to ensure that manufactured parts or products meet specified dimensional requirements and tolerances.

The field of dimensional metrology encompasses a wide range of measurement methods and instruments, including calipers, micrometers, height gauges, coordinate measuring machines (CMMs), optical measurement systems, laser scanners, and 3D imaging technologies.

Why is Dimensional Metrology so important?

It ensures that manufactured parts meet the required specifications and tolerances, which is crucial for the quality and performance of products.
Dimensional metrology ensures that measurements are precise and accurate, helping to maintain consistency in manufacturing processes and reducing errors.
Many industries have regulatory standards that require products to meet specific dimensional requirements. Dimensional metrology helps ensure compliance with these standards.
By identifying and correcting dimensional issues early in the manufacturing process, dimensional metrology can help reduce waste, rework, and overall production costs.
Meeting dimensional requirements leads to products that function as intended, improving customer satisfaction and loyalty.
In industries where precise dimensions are critical for safety, such as aerospace or automotive, dimensional metrology plays a vital role in ensuring the safety and reliability of products.

The Coordinate Measurement Machine (CMM)

The history of Coordinate Measuring Machines (CMMs) traces back to the mid-20th century, evolving through various stages of technological advancements and industrial applications:

The concept of CMMs emerged in the 1950s with the need for precise dimensional measurement in manufacturing industries. Early versions of CMMs were large and cumbersome machines that utilized analog or mechanical measurement systems. These machines were primarily used in aerospace, automotive, and defense industries for quality control purposes.
The 1980s marked a significant turning point with the introduction of digital technology in CMMs. Computer Numerical Control (CNC) technology revolutionized CMMs, enabling automated measurement processes, improved accuracy, and faster data acquisition. This era saw the integration of software systems for data analysis and visualization, enhancing the capabilities of CMMs in dimensional metrology.
In the 21st century, CMM technology continued to advance rapidly, with a focus on improving accuracy, precision, and efficiency. Manufacturers developed innovative solutions such as multi-axis CMMs, non-contact measurement techniques (e.g., laser scanning, optical probing), and advanced sensor technologies (e.g., tactile probes, scanning probes). These advancements expanded the capabilities of CMMs to measure complex geometries, freeform surfaces, and large-scale components with high precision.
With the advent of Industry 4.0 and the Internet of Things (IoT), CMMs have become integral components of smart manufacturing environments. Modern CMMs are equipped with connectivity features, data exchange protocols, and interoperability with other manufacturing systems (e.g., CAD/CAM, ERP). Metrology automation solutions, such as robotic CMMs and in-line inspection systems, have emerged to streamline production processes and enable real-time quality control.
Today, CMMs find widespread applications across various industries, including automotive, aerospace, medical devices, electronics, and consumer goods. They are used for dimensional inspection, geometric analysis, reverse engineering, tool certification, and quality assurance in both production and research settings. The versatility and reliability of CMMs make them indispensable tools for ensuring product quality, process optimization, and compliance with industry standards.

Overall, the history of CMMs reflects a continuous evolution driven by technological innovation, industrial demand, and the pursuit of precision in manufacturing and metrology. As manufacturing processes continue to evolve, CMM technology will likely evolve further to meet the ever-changing demands of industry and maintain its role as a cornerstone of quality assurance.

The Portable Coordinate Measurement Machine (PCMM)

The history of Portable Coordinate Measuring Machines (PCMMs) traces back to the mid-20th century, evolving through various stages of technological advancements and industrial applications:

The first PCMMs were introduced in the 1970s with the development of articulated arms. These devices featured multiple interconnected segments with rotational joints, allowing for flexibility and mobility in measuring objects. Although not as accurate as stationary CMMs, articulated arms provided a portable solution for dimensional measurement tasks in various industries.
Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, advancements in electronics and metrology technologies led to improvements in PCMMs. Manufacturers introduced electronic probes and sensors that enhanced the accuracy and precision of measurements. Additionally, the development of laser trackers and photogrammetry systems expanded the capabilities of PCMMs, allowing for non-contact measurement and inspection of large objects.
In the 21st century, PCMMs underwent further miniaturization and advancements in technology. Handheld devices equipped with laser scanners and touch probes became increasingly popular for on-site measurement tasks, offering greater flexibility and ease of use. These modern PCMMs are capable of capturing detailed 3D measurements with high accuracy and repeatability.
Recent trends in PCMMs involve the integration of advanced software solutions for data analysis, visualization, and automation. This allows for seamless integration with CAD (Computer-Aided Design) software and facilitates tasks such as inspection, reverse engineering, and dimensional analysis.

The adoption and maturation of PCMMs reflects a broadening of dimensional metrology, resulting in versatile, accurate, and user-friendly solutions for dimensional measurement and inspection tasks across various industries.

Traditional vs. Portable CMMs

Traditionally, CMMs were large, stationary machines installed in dedicated metrology labs. However, advancements in technology have led to the development of portable CMMs, which offer increased flexibility and versatility. Let's compare traditional CMMs with portable CMMs:

Traditional CMMs are large and stationary machines that require a dedicated space in a metrology lab. They are not easily moved and typically involve significant installation and setup time.
Portable CMMs are compact and lightweight, designed to be easily transported to different locations, including shop floors, production lines, or field environments. They offer greater flexibility in measurement tasks and can be quickly set up for use.
Traditional CMMs often provide high accuracy and precision, suitable for demanding measurement applications requiring tight tolerances. They are typically equipped with precise linear scales and high-quality probing systems.
Portable CMMs offer varying levels of accuracy and precision depending on the model and manufacturer. While some portable CMMs may not match the accuracy of traditional CMMs, advancements in technology have led to portable systems that can achieve high levels of accuracy for many measurement tasks.
Traditional CMMs generally have larger measurement volumes, allowing them to accommodate larger parts or assemblies. They are well-suited for measuring complex components with multiple features.
Portable CMMs have smaller measurement volumes compared to traditional CMMs. While they may not be suitable for measuring very large parts, they excel at measuring smaller to medium-sized components with high accuracy and flexibility.re
Traditional CMMs are best suited for controlled environments such as metrology labs, where precise measurements are conducted on a wide range of parts.
Portable CMMs offer greater application flexibility, allowing measurements to be performed directly on the shop floor, in production environments, or even in the field. They are ideal for in-process inspection, tooling setup, and reverse engineering tasks.
Traditional CMMs are typically more expensive to purchase, install, and maintain due to their larger size and complexity.
Portable CMMs may have a lower initial cost compared to traditional CMMs, and they may offer cost savings in terms of transportation, setup, and maintenance.

In summary, traditional CMMs and portable CMMs each have their advantages and limitations depending on the specific measurement requirements, environment, and budget constraints. Traditional CMMs excel in high-precision metrology applications, while portable CMMs offer greater flexibility and accessibility for on-site measurements in various industries.

CMMs: 3-Axis vs 5-Axis

CMMs, at minimum, consist of a probe head attached to a moving mechanism that can move along three axes (X, Y, and Z) to measure the dimensions of an object accurately.

The primary difference between 3-axis and 5-axis CMMs lies in their capabilities and the complexity of the shapes they can measure.

These machines can move the probe along three linear axes: X, Y, and Z.
They are suitable for measuring simple geometries and features that lie primarily in straight lines or planes.
3-axis CMMs are often more affordable and simpler to operate than their counterparts on this list.
They are commonly used in industries where parts have relatively simple geometries and where high accuracy is required but complex measurements are not necessary.
In addition to the three linear axes, a 3-Axis CMM with a motorized probe head can can also move along two rotational axes within the probe head, typically referred to as the A and B axes.
These rotations are performed when the X, Y, and Z axes are stationary, and no adjustment can be made while the machine is actively measuring points. Because the CMM can only move along the linear axes when measuring, these machines fall in the 3-Axis category.
The additional rotational axes allow the probe to reach more complex features and geometries from different angles without repositioning the part.
The term “5-Axis” refers to a machine that can synchronize the movement of the rotational axes A and B with the CMM’s linear movements in X, Y, and Z while actively measuring points.
This synchronization allows for measurement programs to complete their cycle duration much faster than by traditional means.

In short, the choice between a 3-axis, a 3-Axis with a motorized probe head, and a 5-axis CMM depends on the specific requirements of the measurement task.

Laser Scanners vs Structured Light Scanners

Metrology laser scanners and structured light scanners are both commonly used in industrial metrology for capturing precise 3D measurements of objects. Each technology has its strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between them depends on various factors such as the application requirements, surface characteristics of the object, accuracy needs, and scanning environment. Here's a comparison between the two:

Laser Emission: The scanner emits laser beams towards the object being scanned. These lasers can be emitted in a single line or multiple lines, depending on the specific scanner design.
Surface Interaction: As the laser beams strike the surface of the object, they are reflected back to the scanner. The time it takes for the laser beams to return to the scanner is measured, providing information about the distance between the scanner and the object's surface at each point where the laser beam makes contact.
Triangulation: Metrology laser scanners often use a triangulation method to determine the distance to the object's surface. By measuring the angle of the laser beam when it strikes the object and the angle of the reflected beam when it returns to the scanner, along with the known distance between the laser emitter and the sensor, the scanner can calculate the precise distance to each point on the object's surface.
Data Processing: The scanner collects measurements from multiple viewpoints as it moves or rotates around the object, creating a dense point cloud representing the surface geometry of the object.
Point Cloud Generation: The collected data is processed by specialized software to generate a point cloud, which consists of millions of points in three-dimensional space. Each point in the cloud represents a specific location on the object's surface.
Mesh Generation: Optionally, the point cloud data can be further processed to create a polygonal mesh, which provides a more detailed representation of the object's surface geometry.
Projection: The scanner projects a known pattern of light onto the object being scanned. This pattern can be a grid, stripes, or other geometric shapes.
Surface Interaction: As the pattern of light interacts with the surface of the object, it becomes deformed based on the contours and features of the object.
Image Capture: Cameras or sensors within the scanner capture images of the deformed pattern from multiple viewpoints.
Analysis: The captured images are analyzed by specialized software, which calculates the 3D coordinates of points on the object's surface based on the deformation of the projected pattern.
Point Cloud Generation: The software processes the collected data to generate a dense point cloud representing the surface geometry of the scanned object.
Mesh Generation: Optionally, the point cloud data can be used to create a polygonal mesh, which provides a more detailed representation of the object's surface.

Both metrology laser scanners and structured light scanners have their advantages and are suitable for different applications. Laser scanners excel in accuracy & speed, while structured light scanners offer versatility in capturing data from various surface types.

Laser Trackers: IFM vs ADM

IFM (Interferometer Frequency Modulation) and ADM (Absolute Distance Measurement) are two different methods used in laser trackers for high-precision measurements in various industrial applications, particularly in fields such as aerospace, automotive, and manufacturing. Both methods have their own advantages and limitations.

Principle: IFM relies on the interference of laser light to determine distances accurately. It works by modulating the frequency of the laser beam and measuring the phase shift caused by the reflection of the beam from a target.
Advantages: High accuracy: IFM can achieve very high measurement accuracies.
Good performance in dynamic environments: IFM systems can handle dynamic environments well, making them suitable for applications such as real-time tracking of moving objects.
Limitations: Complexity: Implementing IFM systems can be complex and requires precise calibration.
Susceptibility to environmental factors: IFM measurements can be influenced by factors such as temperature, humidity, and air turbulence, which may require additional compensation techniques.
Principle: ADM measures distances directly without relying on interference phenomena. It typically uses time-of-flight measurements or phase comparison techniques to determine the distance between the tracker and the target.
Advantages: Simple implementation: ADM systems are often simpler to implement and calibrate compared to IFM systems.
Robustness: ADM measurements are generally less affected by environmental factors compared to IFM measurements.
Limitations: Lower accuracy compared to IFM: While ADM can provide high accuracy, it may not achieve the same level of precision as IFM, especially in dynamic environments.
Limited range: Some ADM systems may have a limited measurement range compared to IFM systems.

In summary, IFM offers extremely high accuracy and good performance in dynamic environments but can be more complex and susceptible to environmental factors. On the other hand, ADM provides simpler implementation and greater robustness but may sacrifice some accuracy and range compared to IFM. The choice between IFM and ADM depends on the specific requirements of the application, including the desired level of accuracy, environmental conditions, and budget constraints.

Currently some laser trackers have only ADM systems while others have a combination of IFM and ADM systems.

GD&T: A Brief History

Geometric Dimensioning & Tolerancing (GD&T) is a system for defining and communicating engineering tolerances. It originated in the early 1940s with efforts led by Stanley Parker and was further developed by the U.S. military during World War II to improve the quality and interchangeability of parts for military equipment. The early stages of GD&T were primarily focused on improving manufacturing processes and ensuring the compatibility of parts produced by different manufacturers.

In 1957, the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) published the first standard for GD&T, known as ASME Y14.5. This standard provided a comprehensive set of rules and symbols for defining geometric tolerances on engineering drawings. Over the years, ASME Y14.5 has undergone several revisions to incorporate new techniques and advancements in manufacturing technology.

GD&T gained widespread adoption in the aerospace, automotive, and other industries as a means of precisely defining the allowable variations in form, size, orientation, and location of features on a part. It offers several advantages over traditional tolerance methods, including better communication of design intent, increased manufacturing efficiency, and improved product quality.

In recent years, GD&T has continued to evolve with the emergence of digital manufacturing technologies and the increasing demand for tighter tolerances in high-precision industries. As a result, organizations such as ASME and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) have continued to update and refine GD&T standards to meet the evolving needs of modern engineering practices.

ASME vs ISO: A Condensed Comparison

ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers) and ISO (International Organization for Standardization) are two major organizations that develop and publish standards for various industries, including engineering, manufacturing, and technology. While both organizations aim to promote standardization and interoperability, they differ in their geographic focus, scope, and approach to standards development.

ASME standards are primarily used in the United States and North America, although they are recognized and utilized internationally in some industries.
ISO standards are developed on a global scale and are widely adopted by organizations and industries worldwide.
ASME standards are developed by committees comprised of experts from industry, academia, government, and other relevant stakeholders. The process involves consensus-based decision-making and public review.
ISO standards are developed by technical committees composed of experts from participating national standards bodies. The development process follows the principles of consensus, transparency, and relevance.
ASME standards are widely adopted in industries such as aerospace, automotive, petrochemical, and power generation, particularly in North America.
ISO standards are recognized globally and often serve as a basis for national standards in many countries. They are commonly referenced in international trade agreements and procurement contracts.
ASME publishes standards such as ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC), ASME B31 series for piping systems, ASME Y14 series for engineering drawings, and many others.
ISO publishes standards such as ISO 9001 for quality management systems, ISO 14001 for environmental management systems, ISO 27001 for information security management systems, and numerous technical standards covering various industries and technologies.

Ultimately, while both ASME and ISO play significant roles in standardization, ASME standards are more prevalent in North America and focus on specific engineering disciplines, whereas ISO standards have a global reach and cover a broader spectrum of industries and topics.

Statistical Process Control

Statistical Process Control (SPC) is a quality control method used to monitor, control, and improve manufacturing processes. It involves the use of statistical techniques to analyze process data in real-time or over a period of time to ensure that the process operates efficiently, produces high-quality products, and meets customer specifications. Here are some key components and principles of Statistical Process Control:

SPC relies on the collection of process data, which may include measurements, observations, or counts related to the characteristics of the product or process being monitored. Data can be collected manually or automatically using sensors and data acquisition systems.
SPC employs statistical methods to analyze process data and identify patterns, trends, and abnormalities that may indicate variations in the process. Common statistical techniques used in SPC include calculation of process capability indices, analysis of variance (ANOVA), regression analysis, and hypothesis testing.
Control charts are graphical tools used in SPC to monitor process performance over time. The most common types of control charts include:
X-bar and R chart: Monitors the central tendency (mean) and variability (range) of a process.
Individuals chart (I-chart): Monitors individual data points to detect shifts or trends in process performance.
P-chart and C-chart: Used for monitoring the proportion of non-conforming units or the count of defects in a sample.
Control limits are established based on the process variability and customer specifications to define the acceptable range of variation for process parameters. Control limits are typically set at ±3 standard deviations from the process mean and serve as thresholds for determining whether the process is in control or out of control.
SPC involves continuous monitoring of process performance using control charts. When data points fall outside the control limits or exhibit unusual patterns, operators or quality control personnel take corrective actions to investigate and address the root causes of process variations. This may involve adjusting process parameters, troubleshooting equipment, or implementing process improvements.
SPC is a continuous improvement process. It provides feedback to identify opportunities for process improvement and optimization. By reducing variation and maintaining process stability, SPC helps organizations achieve higher levels of quality and efficiency.

Overall, SPC is a powerful methodology for achieving process stability, reducing waste and defects, and enhancing overall quality and productivity in manufacturing and service industries.